A novel surgical debridement technique for the treatment of Fournier's gangrene

Xiao-Hui Chen

doi:10.4103/aja.aja_6_21

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Year : 2021 | Volume : 23 | Issue : 5 | Page : 541-542

A novel surgical debridement technique for the treatment of Fournier's gangrene

Xiao-Hui Chen¹, Peng-Pai Qin², Zhong-Xing Zhang³, Ji-Yan Lin⁴, Jing-Jing Zhang⁵
¹ Department of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361003, China Division No.1 of Surgery, Beijing Rectum Hospital, Beijing 100035, China Department of Cosmetic and Plastic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China

Date of Submission	15-Sep-2020
Date of Acceptance	08-Dec-2020
Date of Web Publication	19-Feb-2021

Correspondence Address:
Peng-Pai Qin
Division No.1 of Surgery, Beijing Rectum Hospital, Beijing 100035
China
Xiao-Hui Chen
Department of Emergency Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361003
China

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Check

DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_6_21

How to cite this article:
Chen XH, Qin PP, Zhang ZX, Lin JY, Zhang JJ. A novel surgical debridement technique for the treatment of Fournier's gangrene. Asian J Androl 2021;23:541-2

How to cite this URL:
Chen XH, Qin PP, Zhang ZX, Lin JY, Zhang JJ. A novel surgical debridement technique for the treatment of Fournier's gangrene. Asian J Androl [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 15];23:541-2. Available from: https://www.ajandrology.com/text.asp?2021/23/5/541/309877

Dear Editor,

Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a life-threatening disease which is characterized by necrotizing fasciitis of the genital, perianal, and perineal regions.^[1] FG was initially found in young healthy males in the late 1800s with the acute onset of fulminant idiopathic genital gangrene.^[2] But now, FG has been seen in people of different ages, from newborn babies to the elderly.^[3] Previous studies suggested females constituted the majority of the cases of FG, characterized by necrotizing fasciitis of the genital, perianal, and perineal regions.^[4] However, due to the inability to obtain a precise diagnosis of FG in many cases, the death toll among females with the above symptoms has been underestimated.^[1] Removing necrotic tissue as rapidly as possible through debridement was generally considered to increase the survival rate of patients suffering from FG,^[5],[6] even among those with sepsis or septic shock.^[7] When performing debridement, surgeons needed to take into account the complete excision of necrotic tissue and the meticulous assessment of the potential salvageable soft tissue.^[8] Performing aggressive debridement has been the most common technique for the surgical treatment of patients with FG.^[1],[9] However, aggressive debridement technique results in a large incision and severe trauma from resecting all necrotic skin, underlying subcutaneous tissue, fascia, and muscle until the viable tissue is reached. Herein, we summarize clinical practices of the minimal and intermittent cutting in debridement, suggesting that this technique combined with the analysis of clinical symptoms, laboratory diagnosis, and etiological and microbiological features will be a great addition to the armamentarium for patients with limited FG.

Sixty-five patients were diagnosed with FG and hospitalized between December 2015 and December 2018 in Beijing Rectum Hospital (Beijing, China). The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Rectum Hospital (ellyy-2020-003). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this study and any accompanying images. Patients diagnosed with cellulitis, erysipelas, gas gangrene, or abscess during hospitalization were excluded from the study. FG was diagnosed through clinical practices dependent on patients' medical history as well as physical examination or radiologic imaging. The diagnosis standards of FG were based on the presence of these conditions: temperature > 38°C, swollen perianal/scrotal region, skin erythema, purulence or wound discharge, and fluctuation or crepitus. The criteria for exclusion were: no full-layer necrosis found in the process of surgery and no necrotic tissue detected in post-surgery pathological testing. Furthermore, the diagnosis was confirmed by the evidence from surgical inspection and specimen collection. Moreover, the age, gender, disease etiology, factors of predisposing, initial symptoms, microbiologic test, length of stay in the hospital, the number of debridements, Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI), and outcomes of patients were collected and analyzed.

To calculate the FGSI, nine variables including temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, serum sodium, serum potassium, white blood count, serum creatinine, hematocrit, and serum bicarbonate were collected and assessed. The deviation from the normal condition was graded by a number from 0 to 4 in terms of a previous study [Supplementary Table 1 [Additional file 1]].^[2] Of the sixty-five patients in the study, 7 females and 58 males, average age was 43.46 (standard deviation [s.d.]: 13.39) years, and average length of stay in hospital was 13.81 (s.d.: 8.40) days. The patients experienced the debridement procedure an average of 1.57 (s.d.: 0.81) times and the average FGSI score was 1.86 (s.d.: 2.22) points. All parameters showed no statistical significance between genders (all P ≥ 0.05; [Supplementary Table 2 [Additional file 2]]. Minimal and intermittent cutting of the traumatic zones was performed on all patients within 12 h of being admitted to the hospital. The standard treatment procedure was as follows: initial incision with a length of 2–3 cm based on the most obvious swelling, fluctuation, and crepitus area; then excision of the fusiform skin and subcutaneous tissue until the necrotizing tissues were exposed; then loosening and removal of some necrotizing tissues, forming a circular wound surface with a diameter of 2–3 cm. The above procedure was repeated at 2–3 cm intervals until the healthy tissue boundary was reached. Vessel forceps were then used to bluntly separate the abscess cavity between two incisions to discharge pus. A draining seton was left between every two incisions. The procedure concluded with washing the wounds with 3% hydrogen peroxide solution and physiological saline. The wound surface was then dressed with the cotton gauze. Specimens from the patients were used for culture and biopsy. The cotton gauze was changed twice a day until the disappearance of necrotizing tissue and the formation of healthy granulation tissue [Figure 1]. Patients with severe sepsis received the support of vasopressors, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU). All patients received broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy in the emergency room. Intravenous carbapenems or third-generation cephalosporin plus metronidazole were applied after antibiotic resistance and other new antibiosis therapies were used based on the microbiological analysis. Due to severe sepsis and septic shock, 11 patients (16.9%) were transferred to the ICU for further treatment after debridement. All 65 patients in this study survived.

Figure 1: The procedure of minimal and intermittent cutting of the traumatic zones. (a) Preoperative image. The preoperative image from a 50-year-old male patient showed obvious erythema, perianal and scrotal edema. (b) Intraoperative image. The intraoperative image of debridement with a drainage opened from the scrotum and perianal region by using the method of minimal and intermittent cutting. Some necrotizing tissue was preserved until it fell off spontaneously. (c) Immediate postoperative image. Rubber strips were hung between every two incisions for drainage. (d) Image of 40 days after the first debridement. Image was taken at 40 days postoperative when necrotizing tissue fell off, with the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and granulation tissue growing toward the center of the incisions.

Click here to view

Performing aggressive debridement was the most common technique for the surgical treatment of patients with FG.^[1],[9] However, this debridement technique results in a large incision and severe trauma result from resecting all necrotic skin, underlying subcutaneous tissue, fascia, and muscle until viable tissue is reached. Moreover, aggressive debridement increases the operative time and results in the wound area requiring secondary intervention; plastic surgical reconstruction has even been performed for many patients with FG. Recently, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) combined with surgical debridement was proved to be beneficial for patients with FG.^[10] In this study, all patients underwent minimal and intermittent cutting debridement within 12 h of being admitted to the hospital and all the patients survived from FG. More importantly, the patients in our study showed lower mortality and a shorter length of hospital stay on average, compared with previous reports.^[10] In summary, the present study demonstrates that the minimal and intermittent cutting debridement technique can reduce operative time and soft-tissue destruction, revealing a previously unrecognized surgical method for the treatment of FG.

The main limitations of the present study were the small cohort size and relatively short follow-up period. Another limitation was that most of the patients exhibited mild symptoms based on their FGSI scores. Further studies with large cohorts and patients with FGSI > 9 or FGSI ≤ 9 are required to evaluate this technique.

Author Contributions

XHC and PPQ conceived and designed this study, and drafted the manuscript. ZXZ helped to draft the manuscript and perform the statistical analysis. JYL and JJZ collected and analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

All authors declared no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31701201).

Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Asian Journal of Andrology website.

References

1.	Eke N. Fournier's gangrene: a review of 1726 cases. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 718–28.
2.	Laor E, Palmer LS, Tolia BM, Reid RE, Winter HI. Outcome prediction in patients with Fournier's gangrene. J Urol 1995; 154: 89.
3.	Li YD, Zhu WF, Qiao JJ, Lin JJ. Enterostomy can decrease the mortality of patients with Fournier gangrene. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 7950–4.
4.	Czymek R, Frank P, Limmer S, Schmidt A, Jungbluth T, et al. Fournier's gangrene: is the female gender a risk factor? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010; 395: 173–80.
5.	Sorensen M, Krieger J, Rivara FP, Broghammer J, Klein M, et al. Fournier's gangrene: population based epidemiology and outcomes. J Urol 2009; 181: 2120–6.
6.	Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein EJ, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2014; 59: 147–59.
7.	Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Crit Care Med 2017; 43: 486–552.
8.	Wong CH, Yam KT, Tan BH, Song C. Approach to debridement in necrotizing fasciitis. Am J Surg 2008; 196: e19–24.
9.	Stevens DL, Bryant AE. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 2253–65.
10.	Creta M, Longo N, Arcaniolo D, Giannella R, Cai T, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy reduces mortality in patients with Fournier's gangrene. Results from a multi-institutional observational study. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2020; 72: 223–8.